The Differences Between Products Like Precast and Architectural EPS

One thing that we say to builders that have never used architectural cement coated EPS before is that as soon as you try it, you’re going to find that it’s your favorite material – one that compares favorably to nearly any other product that you’ve used in the past.

It is especially popular as an alternative to precast. Most architects and contractors that have replaced their precast products with our EPS products never go back, using architectural EPS for nearly all of the projects that they choose to complete.

Check out the following table to see a small sample of the many reasons why architectural EPS is preferable to precast in most respects:

Feature Precast Concrete Architectural EPS (Cement Coated)
Weight Heavy – requires cranes and reinforced structures Lightweight – easy to transport, handle, and install
Installation Slow, labor-intensive, specialized equipment needed Fast installation with standard crews and tools
Cost High material and shipping costs Lower cost to fabricate, ship, and install
Design Flexibility Limited shapes, longer lead times Highly customizable, fast turnaround
Durability Strong, but prone to cracking and weathering Cement coating protects against impact, weather, and moisture
Maintenance Repairs are costly and difficult Low-maintenance, easy to repair if damaged
Energy Efficiency Poor insulation properties Provides insulation value, reduces thermal bridging

Not only does architectural EPS compare favorably to precast, but it also compares well to GFRC, wood, stone, and so much more.

The best way to learn more is to reach out to our sales team and see our products for yourself. Contact us today to get started.

Skip to content